<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trade Compliance Blog &#187; denied party screening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trade-compliance.org/tag/denied-party-screening/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trade-compliance.org</link>
	<description>Trade Compliance Resources &#38; News covering import compliance and export compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Big Companies, Big Compliance Violations, Big Fines</title>
		<link>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/big-companies-big-compliance-violations-big-fines</link>
		<comments>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/big-companies-big-compliance-violations-big-fines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[customs compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global trade management software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied party screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted party screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctioned party screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trade-compliance.org/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the heels of Xe Services' (formerly Blackwater) recent $42 million fine for export violations; Barclays has also been hit with a whopping $298 million fine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the heels of Xe Services&#8217; (formerly Blackwater) recent <a title="Blackwater Fined $42 million for export violations" href="http://www.tradecontent.info/?p=1225" target="_blank">$42 million fine for export violations</a>; Barclays has also been hit with a whopping $298 million fine.</p>
<p>Barclay&#8217;s violated international sanctions by permitting its employees to accept payments into the US from banks in blocked countries, including Iran, Myanmar, Cuba and Libya.</p>
<p>According the the Wall Street Journal article, &#8220;<a title="Barclays Trade Compliance Violation" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703908704575433781894978828.html?mod=ITP_pageone_0" target="_blank">Barclays Settles U.S. Charges</a>&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/psyberartist/3571114375/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1017" title="costly-export-violation-settlements" src="http://www.trade-compliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/costly-export-violation-settlements-300x252.jpg" alt="costly-export-violation-settlements" width="261" height="220" /></a>In a settlement with U.S. and New York prosecutors made public Monday,  the London-based bank agreed to pay $298 million to settle criminal  charges. And it acknowledged that its employees, between 1995 and 2006,  helped banks in Iran, Cuba, Libya, Myanmar and Sudan evade U.S.  regulations prohibiting payments into the U.S.</p></blockquote>
<p>Between 1995 and 2006, prosecuters allege that Barclays accepted over $500 million in transactions, concertedly covering up the country names where the illegal payments originated from.</p>
<blockquote><p>In other cases, Barclays returned payments out of fear they would be  detected by U.S. officials, sending fax cover sheets that said:  &#8220;Payments to U.S.A. must NOT contain the word listed below.&#8221; Prosecutors  said payments often were re-sent after references to the sanctioned  countries, which included Sudan and Myanmar, were omitted.</p></blockquote>
<p>Other recent high-value fines have come through in recent months, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>ABN Amro settled for  <strong>$500 million</strong> to end allegations that it helped Iran, Libya, Sudan and  Cuba evade U.S. sanctions by &#8220;stripping&#8221; the identities of transactions  to conceal the countries from which they originated.</li>
<li>Credit Suisse Group paid <strong>$536 million</strong> to settle similar violations  involving transactions with Iran.</li>
<li>In 2009, a unit of London-based  Lloyds Banking Group paid <strong>$350 million</strong> related to similar charges after being accused of masking the  origin of payments from Iran and Sudan.</li>
</ul>
<p>WSJ discusses the Barclay&#8217;s case in the first half of the video below:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 150px;"><object id="wsj_fp" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="272" height="180" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=3E6505E6-DC9A-4BB2-AC75-08027972AACD&amp;playerid=1000&amp;plyMediaEnabled=1&amp;configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&amp;autoStart=false" /><param name="src" value="http://online.wsj.com/media/swf/VideoMicroPlayer.swf" /><param name="name" value="anonymous_element_1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="wsj_fp" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="272" height="180" src="http://online.wsj.com/media/swf/VideoMicroPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" name="anonymous_element_1" flashvars="videoGUID=3E6505E6-DC9A-4BB2-AC75-08027972AACD&amp;playerid=1000&amp;plyMediaEnabled=1&amp;configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&amp;autoStart=false" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Xe Services, formerly called &#8220;Blackwater,&#8221; was also fined this week for violating export regulations under ITAR, or the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. While acting as a contractor for the US government in Iraq, the company committed 288 violations of the International Traffic in Arms  Regulations (ITAR), including the “unauthorized export of defense items  and provision of defense services to foreign-end users in multiple  countries from 2003 to 2009.”  While no sensitive technologies were  involved, the items do require a license before they can be exported.</p>
<p>The <em>New York Times </em>reported that<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/21/world/21blackwater.html"> Xe Services committed violations</a> included illegally exporting weapons to Afghanistan, unauthorized proposals to train troops in Sudan, providing  Taiwanese police officers with sniper training, and shipping military equipment to its  personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan.</p>
<p>The company has settled the charges with the State Department to the tune of <strong>$42 million</strong>. Several outstanding allegations, investigations, and indictments remain in process, however, as these aren&#8217;t trade compliance related I&#8217;ll leave them for your own personal reading at <a title="Blackwater Fined $42 million for export violations" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/21/world/21blackwater.html" target="_blank">NYT</a>.</p>
<p>Just goes to show, an ounce of prevention, using <strong><a title="Trade Compliance" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/solutions_trade-compliance.shtml" target="_blank">trade compliance</a></strong> systems, is worth a pound of cure.</p>
<p><em>Special Thanks to <a title="Global Trade Content" href="http://www.tradecontent.info/?p=1225" target="_blank">Global Trade Content Blog</a> and the <a title="Export Compliance Group" href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&amp;gid=1657217&amp;trk=anet_ug_grppro" target="_blank">Export Compliance Group on LinkedIn</a>.</em></p>
<h3><a href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/rl_wp_rps.html" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-489 alignleft" title="Restricted Party Screening White Paper" src="http://www.trade-compliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Restricted-Party-Screening-White-Paper.jpg" alt="Restricted Party Screening White Paper" width="126" height="164" /></a><a title="Restricted Party Screening White Paper" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/rl_wp_rps.html" target="_blank">Screen Restricted Parties to Prevent Doing Business with Sanctioned Countries:</a></h3>
<p>﻿White Paper: <a title="Restricted Party Screening White Paper" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/rl_wp_rps.html" target="_blank">Six Best Practices to Improve Compliance with a Restricted Party Screening Solution</a>: In  this white paper, we look at some critical features to look for when searching  for an optimal RPS solution, and how RPS solutions can manage even high-volume and complex screening processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/big-companies-big-compliance-violations-big-fines/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CTDI Reduces Trade Compliance Risk with Restricted Party Screening Solution</title>
		<link>http://www.trade-compliance.org/trade-compliance/ctdi-reduces-trade-compliance-risk-with-restricted-party-screening-solution</link>
		<comments>http://www.trade-compliance.org/trade-compliance/ctdi-reduces-trade-compliance-risk-with-restricted-party-screening-solution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[customs compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade compliance solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied party list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied party screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restricted party screening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trade-compliance.org/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology Services Company Reduces Corporate Risk with Comprehensive Screening of Restricted Parties EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ, November 5, 2009 &#8212; Management Dynamics, a leading provider of Global Trade Management (GTM) solutions, today announced that Communications Test Design, Inc (CTDI), a full service global engineering, repair and logistics company, implemented its RPS On-Demand solution, an advanced risk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><em>Technology Services Company Reduces Corporate Risk with Comprehensive Screening of Restricted Parties</em></h3>
<p>EAST RUTHERFORD,  												NJ, November 5, 2009 &#8212;  												Management Dynamics, a leading  												provider of 												<a title="GTM Solutions" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/solutions.shtml" target="_blank"> Global Trade Management (GTM)  												solutions</a>, today announced  												that Communications Test Design,  												Inc (CTDI), a full service  												global engineering, repair and  												logistics company, implemented  												its RPS On-Demand solution, an  												advanced risk management  												solution that <strong>screens  												individuals and businesses to  												identify prohibited transactions  												based upon over 90 restricted  												party lists</strong>. Since automating 												<a title="Restricted Party Screening" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/solutions_restricted-party-screening.shtml" target="_blank"> restricted party screening</a>,  												CTDI has significantly reduced  												corporate risk and improved  												compliance with global trade and  												security regulations while  												minimizing time and resources  												required for screening.</p>
<p>Providing repair and logistics  												services for major Telecom and  												Cable service providers and  												OEMs, CTDI also provides the  												service of screening shipments  												for many of its customers. CTDI  												needed to streamline its  												screening process across  												multiple order management  												systems and 25 locations. The  												company selected Management  												Dynamics’ 												<a title="Restricted Party Screening" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/solutions_restricted-party-screening.shtml" target="_blank"> RPS On-Demand</a> solution for  												its functionality, ease of use,  												and ability to centralize its  												compliance with multi-org and  												team-based workflow to enable  												its global branches to easily  												manage their own customer  												shipments.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;</strong><strong>We needed to prevent any  												illegal transactions with  												restricted entities or trade  												parties and avoid potential  												fines and penalties for CTDI and  												its telecom customers. We had  												previously relied on a  												fragmented, incomplete process</strong>,&#8221;  												said Greg Pugh, Global  												Compliance Manager, CTDI.  												&#8220;Management Dynamics provided  												the best value and came highly  												recommended by many authorities  												in the trade industry. It was  												also very important that the  												screening did not create a  												cumbersome distraction during  												high volume shipping processes.  												Since using the 												<a title="Restricted Party Screening" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/solutions_restricted-party-screening.shtml" target="_blank"> RPS On-Demand</a> solution, we  												have significantly reduced our  												corporate risk, liability and  												exposure to prohibited  												transactions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Available on a flexible,  												on-demand architecture,  												Management Dynamics’ RPS  												On-Demand solution addressed  												CTDI’s needs with a secure,  												comprehensive method to automate  												screening of its customers,  												vendors, and other trading  												partners against all restricted  												party lists from governmental  												institutions worldwide. With  												improved screening algorithms  												based on computational  												linguistics, 												<a title="Restricted Party Screening" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/solutions_restricted-party-screening.shtml" target="_blank"> <strong>RPS On-Demand</strong></a><strong> delivers at  												least a 30 percent improvement  												in screening accuracy with a 70  												percent reduction in false  												positives over traditional  												methods</strong>. The Web-based solution  												integrates with any enterprise  												system and can be quickly and  												cost-effectively implemented.</p>
<p>&#8220;Today, exporters are held to a  												higher level of accountability  												to meet government mandates than  												ever before,&#8221; said Jim  												Preuninger, CEO of Management  												Dynamics. &#8220;CTDI uses our RPS  												On-Demand solution to centralize  												and streamline its compliance  												process to improve productivity  												and effectively manage supply  												chain risk.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>About CTDI</strong><br />
A premier Telecommunications  												service company headquartered in  												West Chester, PA., CTDI has  												provided groundbreaking  												maintenance and product service  												solutions to the global  												telecommunications industry  												since 1975. Today, 												<a href="http://www.ctdi.com/"> CTDI</a> offers the most  												comprehensive Service Portfolio  												in the industry that includes:  												Wireline Repair &amp; Logistics,  												Wireless Repair &amp; Logistics,  												Engineering and Installation  												services, Global Supply Chain  												solutions and Product  												Engineering and Manufacturing.  												Today, CTDI services Original  												Equipment Manufacturers (OEM)  												and Carriers with 42  												international strategic repair  												and logistics locations  												supported by an experienced team  												of over 4,500 telecommunications  												professionals. For more  												information, visit 												<a href="http://www.ctdi.com/" target="_blank"> www.ctdi.com</a>.</p>
<h3>Screen for Denied Parties &amp; Sanctioned Countries</h3>
<p>Restricted Party Screening is a must-have procedure for any company engaging in global trade. The risks associated with not having a system in place are becoming increasingly large when you consider the possible sanctions,fines and penalties that are being dealt by the Department of Homeland Security, BIS, and OFAC. The first step to achieving this is implementing a program focused on Trade Partner screening.</p>
<div id="attachment_489" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 172px"><a href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/rl_wp_rps.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-489" title="Restricted Party Screening White Paper" src="http://www.trade-compliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Restricted-Party-Screening-White-Paper.jpg" alt="Restricted Party Screening White Paper" width="162" height="210" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Restricted Party Screening White Paper</p></div>
<h3><a title="Restricted Party Screening White Paper" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/rl_wp_rps.html" target="_blank">Restricted Party Screening White Paper</a></h3>
<p>Management Dynamics’ offers a <a title="Restricted Party Screening" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/solutions_restricted-party-screening.shtml" target="_blank">Restricted Party Screening (RPS)</a> solution that provides a secure, comprehensive method to automate this process, enabling companies to quickly screen their customers, suppliers and other trading partners against all restricted party lists from governmental institutions worldwide.</p>
<p>Learn more about denied party screening by downloading the white paper, <a title="6 Best Practices for Restricted Party Screening" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/rl_wp_rps.html" target="_blank">Six Best Practices to Improve Compliance with a Restricted Party Screening Solution. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trade-compliance.org/trade-compliance/ctdi-reduces-trade-compliance-risk-with-restricted-party-screening-solution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Seeks More Sanctions On Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/us-seeks-more-sanctions-on-iran</link>
		<comments>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/us-seeks-more-sanctions-on-iran#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[export compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customs compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied party screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embargoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trade-compliance.org/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Iran announced intentions for new nuclear facilities, the US is seeking to expand sanctions on Iran, encouraging China and Russia to participate. The Obama administration is scrambling to assemble a package of harsher economic sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program that could include a cutoff of investments to the country’s oil-and-gas industry and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Iran announced intentions for new nuclear facilities, the US is seeking to expand sanctions on Iran, encouraging China and Russia to participate.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Obama administration is scrambling to assemble a package of harsher economic sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program that could include a cutoff of investments to the country’s oil-and-gas industry and restrictions on many more Iranian banks than those currently blacklisted, senior administration officials said Sunday.</p>
<p>The administration also is seeking to build a broader coalition of partners for sanctions so that it may still be able to act against Iran even if China and Russia were to veto harsher measures proposed in the United Nations Security Council.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the complete article at the New York Times: <a title="US Seeking Sanctions Against Iran" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/world/middleeast/28iran.html?_r=1" target="_blank">US Is Seeking a Range of Sanctions Against Iran</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/us-seeks-more-sanctions-on-iran/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Export Compliance: Not Just for the Fortune 500</title>
		<link>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/export-compliance-not-just-for-the-fortune-500</link>
		<comments>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/export-compliance-not-just-for-the-fortune-500#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[export compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied party screening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trade-compliance.org/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As discussed recently in some of my favorite blogs, Research Institutions need export compliance too! Although most don&#8217;t realize it, universities and other institutes export things every day &#8211; and frequently these can be high-tech items containing sensitive, private data. Just like everyone else, Universities must obtain licenses and comply with trade laws. Additionally, when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As discussed recently in some of my favorite blogs, Research Institutions need <a title="Export Compliance" href="http://www.managementdynamics.com/html/rl_br_trade_export.html?source=Trade-Compliance.org" target="_blank">export compliance</a> too!</p>
<p>Although most don&#8217;t realize it, universities and other institutes export things every day &#8211; and frequently these can be high-tech items containing sensitive, private data. Just like everyone else, Universities must obtain licenses and comply with trade laws.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/negativz/41549347/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-97" title="computer chip" src="http://www.trade-compliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/computer-chip-150x150.jpg" alt="computer chip" width="145" height="145" /></a>Additionally, when hiring employees or permitting visitors, these organizations need to be sure they truly know who they are dealing with &#8211; making <a title="Denied Party Screening" href="http://www.deniedpartyscreening.org" target="_blank">denied party screening</a> another important requirement for the education and research communities.</p>
<p>Visit the Academic Export Compliance blog to read  <a href="http://eduexportcompliance.blogspot.com/2009/06/best-practices-for-export-control.html" target="_blank">Best  Practices for Export Compliance in a Research Institution</a></p>
<p>Or, check out <a href="http://boskagetradenews.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-should-universities-worry-about.html" target="_blank">Why  Should Universities Worry About Export Control Laws?</a> from Boskage Trade News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trade-compliance.org/export-compliance/export-compliance-not-just-for-the-fortune-500/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

